It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
"doing its best to avoid civilian causalities, even though there will be casualties" 
"allow Hamas to continue running Gaza" 
Incredible consent manufacturing by Harvard Harris, even with that batshit wording 43% of young people still said fuck that lmao
Do you use hard drugs such as crack cocaine and/or masturbate in public and/or feel violent urges towards pets, children and the elderly and/or support Palestine?
"Do you think our god like super warriors in Israel should wipe out the vermin in Gaza or allow the people to live in filth, vote yes or no"
77% are following Israel closely and 63% aren't following it closely 🤡
The "following closely" and "not following closely" columns each add up to 100%. It's organized in an unclear way but it adds up
On the first read (and second and third, I really struggle to parse it lol) it said: among people who support moving forward with an operation in Rafah, 77% are following Israel closely and 63% aren’t following it closely. In hindsight I can't read 🫠
Te question is not about if they follow or not the occupied state of Palestine, but from each one if they support more genocide or not.
“Yeah we totally promise to stop bombing Gaza after we turn Rafah into rubble. Pinky swear.”
These Harvard polls are absolute slop. Manufacturing consent to the fullest.
The questions they ask are obviously designed to elicit responses that support the status quo. Everyone headline about “80% of Americans support israel” is based solely on people being asked “Do you support israel or Hamas more?” with only two response options 
Why dont they just let palestinians have a november election and ask them to vote so hard that Hamas disintegrates? I thought this was about democracy?
If the past 6 months don't convince you that the IDF can't be trusted to "avoid civilian casualties" at all, and that no amount of promises would make any material difference on the amount of innocents being killed, I don't know what to tell you.
Besides the obvious, it is absolutely pointless asking Americans this detailed of a question about foreign policy. Like 90% of Americans barely have any idea about what’s going on other than maybe some vague notion of an “Israel-Hamas War”. This question may have well as been asked in Hindi, it would be just as incomprehensible to most Americans. So the obvious slant in the wording will direct most people to answer a certain way just because it sounds nice.
They push polled so hard that the participants got bruises.
Should we do another 9/11 even though innocent civilians will be killed (we will do our best to avoid civilian casualties) or should we allow the Biden administration to continue running New York?
whats even the population being polled?
Registered US voters
43% Zoomers