this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
68 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

3981 readers
413 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The European government has spent a few years trying to break encryption. The results have been, at best, mixed. Of course, the EU government claims it’s not actually interested in breaking encryption. Instead, it hides its intentions behind phrases like “client-side scanning” and “chat control.” But it all just means the same thing: purposefully weakening or breaking encryption to allow the government to monitor communications.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We need to make you more vulnerable in order to keep you safe.

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 19 points 1 year ago

"OUR government would never abuse surveillance powers, trust me bro!"

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From the perspective of a systems analyst and admin here on p.d:

to me this looks like a poor attempt by some instance admins trying to harvest their user's data by requiring a backdoor to everyone's computer

news like this makes me sad and tired cause it's blatantly apparent that some users still don't understand why trust and consent is important

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, that things they'll do to "keep you safe."

This could never be misused... No possible way.

[–] henfredemars 6 points 1 year ago

Trust us. It’s for your own good.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It’s okay everybody understands computers now. I mean, they must because they use them all day every day right. So this will obviously not be a problem.