this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
33 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

10431 readers
838 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
otter@piefed.ca
mp3@piefed.ca
33
Poilievre’s unspoken words say everything (rabble.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world to c/canada@lemmy.ca
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's amazing how much money is made every year in real estate and how much the average Canadian is willing to draw from for affordability.

Few of us realize the extent of profit involved in the rising prices, and that’s the last thing Poilievre wants to talk about. Economist Jim Stanford notes that the real estate sector took after-tax net profit of $55.8 billion in 2022 – up 65 per cent from 2019. It remains at a historically high $48.5 billion in 2023. On top of that, construction profits are almost 50 per cent higher than pre-pandemic levels, totalling $31.2 billion in 2023. The amounts are simply staggering.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you outlawed real-estate agents and made housing transactions go through at-cost through a public board, you'd probably do more for housing than just about anything else.

When economists talk about non-productive uses of capital, this is what they mean. This isn't "investing", this is parasitism.

[–] SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just to pull a number out of my ass I think we're 10 years away having enough people vote for affordability to actually have politicians implement any sincere policies meant to make housing affordable.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not profit, it's theft. It is profitable for a contractor to build a new house in a market like ours - even if the sale price is completely mismatched to the effort it took to build it those millions of dollars are going to people who made something they innovated a new object into existence.

Our market is one of theft, the elderly generation and the corporations they spawned to commoditize housing are robbing the young of the ability to invest in businesses or their leisure or starting a new family. The market needs to crash.

(Obviously, Canada is both reselling existing housing and constructing some new housing... but our construction sector is tiny compared to the resale market).

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Profit is what's left over after everyone who's done the work gets paid for their labour (including those with equity), so that means all profit is theft. Either the customer overpaid, or the workers were underpaid (or both).

[–] SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There's a Chinese proverb: Winners are kings and losers are bandits.

I'm really not to hung up on the wording of how the money ends up in who's pockets most people think they're the good guy. I just wonder if really have to wait until things get so much worse before we can get a majority on housing affordability.