this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
259 points (96.4% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10722 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] casmael@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dafuq they doing over there

[–] stevecrox@kbin.run 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

SpaceX are on track to launch 130 times this year. The industry competitors launch 6-12 times per year.

I suspect the higher incident rate is related, since you will need to manufacture, roll out, etc.. much more often.

The article also talks about most the incidents being in booster recovery. Only 2 Space competitors do that,

Blue Origins sub orbital booster always returned to launch site and at best managed monthly launch. This rocket hasn't launched in more than a year.

Rocket Lab perform ocean recovery but only launched 11 times last year and only recovered the booster twice.

So its hard to really compare

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Still, the specific injuries sound gruesome, like amputations and crushing. And sure, to a degree this just happens if you do something often enough, but we have safety standards for a reason, it's wild to me that this isn't something where safety is paramount.

After all, think about all the product that could get damaged! 😑

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Elongated Muskrat runs his companies like the cyberpunk villain he aspires to be. Wouldn’t be surprised if all the employees at his companies signed over their physical bodies and implants as part of an NDA because he lives in a fantasy land where it’s 2019 rain-drenched fire-spewing-tower L.A.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Of course Elon Musk doesn't actually run SpaceX

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Musk is trying to make the US labor board unconstitutional. The reason why is outrageously transparent based on this article. Fuck that monster.

[–] OrkneyKomodo@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

This image gives me Subnautica vibes.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

A previous Reuters investigation found that the approximately 600 reported injuries in 2022 included crushed limbs, cuts, burns, eye injuries, electrocutions, amputations, and serious head injuries, according to the news outlet, which noted that data from prior years are either incomplete or non-existent.

Oh my lanta.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This tells me a lot not just about SpaceX but also "industry norms."

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

TRW got us to from Pioneer to the fucking moon without shitting on unions or massively injuring their workers.

Elon takes his parents blood money and buys Tom Mueller… yet people act like it’s the second coming of Jesus while the same engineers now suffer for his ego.

All so a single trust fund baby can claim land in LEO.

load more comments
view more: next ›