this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
365 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

83500 readers
2987 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 125 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Maybe they should try slashing their scumbag CEO

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No no, they need to pay him 59 billion even though even a judge called the proposed payment illegal.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

remember, " Illegal " means "Something only the truly powerful can get away with."

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

No, the issue is they’re not paying him $69B

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 123 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] tourist@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (17 children)

cruise control with a higher fatality rate

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I'm stealing this... way too funny

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago

Booze cruise control.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Full self crashing

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago

Honestly that's the best possible name for it.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because what you really want is a car that specifically depends on long term software updates, and is frequently the target of product recalls, from a company in financial freefall.

[–] Juice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm expecting the company to go out of business and all of the cars to just brick.

Might be a good move to figure out how to hack the software and/or reclaim the batteries for resale, might be kinda lucrative.

On the other hand, if they do brick overnight it might be dangerous, and I hope Tesla demonstrates some responsibility to the lives and safety of their consumers. I don't expect them to, but I hope so.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even if they don't fail, knowing how to hack them, how to replace the Tesla computer with your own that functions without Tesla approval, how to make the car function without self driving that might lock up the tires at highway speeds... These are valuable skills to have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 13 points 2 years ago (5 children)

They are "too big to fail now". If they pop now, the ruins will be bought quickly. The car won't be allowed to brick. But it is good to highlight the issue that modern car need to be independ of the existence of manufacturers servers. I'd go further and regulate that it must be documented protocols and you must able to change the servers used if you choose.

Same with any computer, if you don't have admin, you don't own it.

[–] Juice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago

too big to fail

That's a good point, it's just as likely (to my cynical mind) that the U.S. govt would just bail them out to the tune of hundreds of billions

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I’m expecting the company to go out of business and all of the cars to just brick.

I agree that Tesla will not be able to maintain their current position, but currently Tesla is one of the most profitable car companies in the world. So chances they'll go out of business anytime soon are very slim.
That said I think they are currently about at their height, with a peek market recognition advantage in EV, earned from their first models where everybody else only made tiny lame city EVs with limited range. Now the competition is catching up and even sometimes surpassing Tesla, and the EV market is in a slump. This is a very different situation for Musk and Tesla to handle, and time will show how well they do that.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

1.81M units sold last, that's $31,000/unit he wants to get paid. For pretty much single-handedly ruining the brand with his stupid yapper in a year.

$2000 a unit price decrease doesn't seem like much compared to that.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When put like that, that's absolutely mad! How can shareholders possibly think that this is good value?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

I bought stocks at 170 and sold a few days ago at like 150. Would not recommend.

If the report is bad, Tesla will probably be back at 110.

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Puts are where it’s at anyway. Hard to predict good moves… easy to see dumb ones that will hurt shortly after they are made.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Not with tesla, shit has been irrational for a decade now. Who knows how long the techbro elonsuckers will keep the price inflated

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

I tried that with them a couple times when it was obviously overvalued years ago. Damned thing just kept going up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] malloc@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t touch a TSLA product even if it was given to me.

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd have no problem accepting a free car

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

And if they want to force me to accept a free solar installation, I’d suffer

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

Must be hard on the idiots who paid full price.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

How long before he burns it all down to collect insurance?

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Too late. Suck less next time.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Speaking on his social media platform X over the weekend, Tesla supremo Elon Musk said price adjustments are an essential part of doing business in the auto industry.

That was followed not long after by the company asking shareholders to reinstate Musk's $56 billion pay package that was recently voided by a Delaware court – again, bad timing given the state of Tesla lately.

Along with cutting prices over the weekend, Elon Musk also postponed a scheduled trip to India in which he was predicted to announce Tesla's expansion into the country.

EV sales have generally been on a decline of late, putting some of the world's biggest manufacturers – like Tesla and Li – in a relatively tight spot.

Tesla recently announced plans to kill its low-priced Model 2 vehicle – a seemingly ideal move when consumers want lower priced electric cars.

PS: Mercedes now reckons it's the first automaker to sell actual self-driving cars in America that don’t require drivers to keep an eye on the road.


The original article contains 567 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Thanks but no thanks, I'll stick to my EAP I got with my model 3 initially. That already tries to kill me enough as it is.

load more comments
view more: next ›