chapotraphouse
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
lmao I’d love to watch a campaign like that. The party consistently doing the right thing while the DM just seethes more and more.
It might be fun to watch but in my experience if the players and the DM are that out of sync its gonna be a bad experience for everyone playing cause at some point the DM is gonna be forced to railroad you back on track if only cause they don't have any material in the direction you want to go. The best games and DMs I have are basically more complicated versions of "Yes And".
The best games and DMs I have are basically more complicated versions of "Yes And".
DnD with no character sheets is my favorite way to get kids into TTRPG's. Make it all up as you go along. Roll with whatever stupid bullshit they come up with, and throw something even stupider back at them. Write it all down. THEN we make the character sheets, after a couple sessions.
e: Anyway, this is why one of my son's friends mains a wizard with tons of air magic. Because he's a fart wizard.
Players consistently rolling on being based checks while the Zionist prick seethes is just so funny
The first thing every DM learns is that the group will never do what you want them to.
I can picture it now
He was probably like
You have to enforce the status quo, they're feeble savages!
And the players were like
No, we will shatter their chains and free them from the yoke of tyranny
i had a DM boot me from a campaign for 'being manipulative' and 'murder hoboing' after i kept killing blatantly racist nazi characters that our multicultural nation was fighting to survive genocide against. said that i didnt ever give the DM time to roleplay things (because i would gat the nazis in the head with a critfish build). maybe make less cartoonishly evil characters? why would i ever talk to a guy that kills babies
i also unknowingly joined a campaign where the dm admitted that all the goblins the players were killing were jews after i pressed him on his monologue about goblin bankers
goblin bankers
Harry Potter, not even once.
said that i didnt ever give the DM time to roleplay things (because i would gat the nazis in the head with a critfish build). maybe make less cartoonishly evil characters? why would i ever talk to a guy that kills babies
Or if you have cartoonishly evil characters they need to be in an environment where the player can not get away with killing them. There's a reason all the nobility live in a walled quarter of the city with its own defences.
I read a criticism of 'come and see' that I'd never considered, that it was quite liberal. They pointed out how (in the movie) the partisans struggled internally with flat out killing the nazis, and how Flyora while shooting at a picture (hallucination?) of Hitler kept seeing him get younger and younger until he was staring at Baby Hitler and he couldn't pull the trigger.
The poster was saying that it's okay to just flat out kill literal nazis and it shouldn't be causing any internal struggle as they're literally wiping you out, and picturing Hitler as a baby is stupid as you can't time travel and he's not a baby while he's conducting a genocide.
With that first paragraph, at least, I get where they're coming from but I feel like it's likely that they've never actually killed somebody. Yes, it's morally acceptable and good to kill Nazis, and also taking a life is a thing that sticks with you in ways you don't expect (from what I've heard; I've never killed anybody either). I just feel like that's a weird thing to criticize the film for. I really doubt anybody goes away from Come And See believing that killing Nazis is wrong or bad, just that war is hell.
I could be totally off-base here; I haven't see the film in a long time. But that criticism just strikes me as not really warranted
There was a fair bit to the guy's post; he also talked about the director of which I don't think he was a giant fan of, but he got a little into Soviet film history and I don't really know much about Soviet film history (or the USSR in general) so I slightly zoned out after a number of posts (the heck is perestroika?), but I managed to find his thread:
It's also funny, because said DMs set themselves up to make the anti-semitism allegations as unconvincing as possible, because the players had no idea who the groups were based on.
DM: "You see a music festival outside the concentration camp."
Player: "I roll for initiative."
DM: "Against the enemies in the concentration camp right?"
Players: "..."
DM: "Against the unarmed goblins inside the concentration camp... Right?"
I roll for acrobatics
Scoofah!
my first time playing a ttrpg was a very odd pathfinder campaign about escaping a slave plantation. this was in kentucky so the vibes were off. whole thing ended up sideways when the dm that cooked that up couldn't stop getting too hammered for us to make progress.
Ahahah holy shit
So it was a Star Wars tabletop right? Lmao
I believe it because whoever that guy is did this with the whole of Last of us 2.
Neil Druckmann moment.
Common Zionist L
It would be funny if the DM thought the problem was that they didn't make it obvious enough the Israel analogy was meant to be Israel, so they try to make it more obvious, but then the players think the DM is a neo-nazi doing a Jewish conspiracy allegory.
I love this stuff. One of my favorite sessions of D&D ever was when I was running the classic three parter The Desert of Desolation, and in the second part of that trilogy there's a bit where the players are looking for a missing princess and one of their leads is a group of Drow slavers operating under the city, and of course the instant the players learned that there were slavers they dropped everything to crush them and free the slaves. I was so proud.
I bet some of those players are still here, actually. We should play again.
what do you expect from a hobby invented by white boys with literal 'race' mechanics that determine your objective 'alignment' in older editions and still play into racial caricatures to this day ('noble savage' orcs instead of just murdering hordes, elves as even special-er white people) and even in the best case scenario only encourage race-based divisions whether based on stats or just aesthetic, after all its a lot more reasonable to be 'racist' against a species of literal giant green monsters with boar tusks (that even if a 'good guy' is constantly being whispered to by their Evil God that created them, in most DnD lore at least) than it is to be racist against a human with more melanin in their skin. and the usual semi-historical settings come pre-baked with implicit old-timey attitudes, people expect swords and sorcery type settings to maintain the patriarchy and nationalism pop culture associates with our own history for the most part even if Player Characters are the Special Chosen One that Bucks the Trend. I mean even outside of DnD, how many fantasy media products even cricticise monarchy? how many protagonists are the Rightful Heir that needs to reclaim their Tragically Lost Throne from the Evil Guy?
It takes effort to salvage a worthwhile story out of something like that, and a lot of people just do the easiest/laziest thing and play to the genre tropes. it's hard enough running a tabletop RPG without interrogating the system's racial biases, or that of your own writing, and most people simply won't bother. to the average non-politically aware person, the races become a visual shorthand for real life groups or assumed historical groups, 'elves' are 'cultured europeans' (french, english, etc), 'orcs' are 'misguided savages' at best, 'murdering subhuman invaders' at worst (muslims, mongols, slavic people, etc) 'gnomes' are 'incomprehensible insular artisans' (jews), 'halflings' are 'nomadic pastoralists' (roma) 'dwarves' are 'industrious europeans' (german, irish, etc.). It's obviously not the only way to write fantasy, but for most people this is what 'fantasy' means to them, a bunch of cultural and racial caricatures fighting each other with magic and swords, because its the laziest and easiest to write that way in our society, given the cultural context, genre assumptions, and history of development of the fantasy genre.
what do you expect from a hobby invented by white boys with literal 'race' mechanics that determine your objective 'alignment' in older editions and still play into racial caricatures to this day
to be fair, the entire party was siding with the palestinians like, constantly
Torturing the DM is a time-honored practice, this just turns it into praxis
I remember watching Sausage Party, the terrible Seth Rogan movie. At the end it's revealed that the movie is an allegory for the Palestine-Israel conflict lol. I don't remember which side it picked, but the ending was all the food items having sex with each other
Sounds like they found a good group of players.
Can someone explain the "into DnD but also a Zionist" archetype? Why do I keep seeing geeks consuming very-much-not-fascism media, while siding with fascism irl?
There must be a pipeline, it's like the reverse effect of WH40k fandom
Fantasy is heavily pro monarchy. In basically every fantasy setting the king/prince/princess is morally good and want the best for their kingdom and its subjects and outsiders that try to change the status quo are the morally kicking dogs bad people. From there, is easy to slide into fascism.
Is it wrong to think that fantasy doesn't necessarily have to include kings and queens in it? Like I think Pikmin is fantasy, there isn't much royalty it.
not necessarily wrong but for normies 'fantasy' = LOTR, game of thrones, DnD, world of warcraft, league of legends type stuff. on a spectrum from 'misunderstood '''realistic''' whitewashed history but with magic for some reason' to 'how does this deviantart poster even manage to draw so many belt buckles on their overly detailed glowing eyes steampunk OC'
Pikmin is technically sci-fi to normies because it has space ships in it
No, you're not wrong "Fantasy" is being used differently between the two of you.
Driving Crooner is using "Fantasy" to mean western medieval fantasy in the tradition of Tolkein.
In its broadest form fantasy of course has no particular relationship with monarchy. Diso Elysium is also in a fantasy world but certainly not monarchist.
They're tolkien DnD bros. Tolkien's racialising and pro-monarchy fantasy is where their brainworms come from.
Also japanese anime is absolutely riddled with pro-monarchy fantasy.
Their beliefs are all fantasy so they feel right at home in a made up world they get to write the rules for?
Can someone explain the "into DnD but also a Zionist" archetype? Why do I keep seeing geeks consuming very-much-not-fascism media, while siding with fascism irl?
Because they don't care. They do a good job at separating the art from the artist, and at times conflating the art with their own views. It's why a lot of bronies are weirdos and fash adjacent. Fascists think when people complaining about their lack of media literacy think every piece of media is anti-capitalism, but that's not true at all. Sometimes a piece of media is simply making fun of these losers with no deeper message and they still refuse to grasp it because they're unable to comprehend that conservatism doesn't create. At least nothing that's widely consumed nowadays.
One time I had an idea for a campaign where the players are goblins in a goblin land under dwarven colonial occupation, never did anything with it but I knew the dwarves would fear and crack down on goblin traditional brewing and alchemy, because the goblin witches can make poison powders and liquids that sink effortlessly between the plates of the heavy armor the dwarves rely on for military supremacy. Only tangentially connected in my mind to Palestine because I didn't really know about it yet, but wanted to share a campaign that never was.
This story sounds implausible. “Saturday Session DM?” Like there are multiple, regularly meeting games?
Pull the other one.
Not that odd; I used to play with a group where three of us were DMs; One guy DMed 4e on Wednesday night games, I DMed Pathfinder Friday nights, and the third guy DMed a 4e LotR game on Monday nights (although I didn't personally play in this one because he was basing it on the Silmarillion and I had no idea who any of the NPCs were; I subbed for another player on the last session and yep, no idea who any of these characters were).
Most of the friends that I have that are into DnD are in at least two games. Some people like doing it more than one night a week and it's hard to find two days out of every week that everybody in the group is cool spending on it.
I like that u/mugrimm still gets posted here, he was an r/cth mod and prolific poster back in the day. Has some DC connections.