this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
308 points (100.0% liked)

196

18191 readers
321 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
308
cougar rule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by secret300@lemmy.sdf.org to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TxzK@lemmy.zip 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually, no. You are an exception to the rule. Please for the love of everything holly, delete this and don't post anything ever again.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look at this fool that doesn't know who holly is. Holly will be coming for you

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Holly would if she could

[–] phuntis@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

jo(jo)e mama

[–] Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 year ago

Revolutionary of you to not have rule in the title. No rule gang rise up

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

That mountain lion doesn't look very healthy.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 1 year ago

Cougar seeking young stud

[–] FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

downvote, no "rule" in title

[–] Uncle_Sheo217@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rule is not required to be in the titles, and never has been. It’s just something that people started back on r/195 because they couldn’t be arsed to come up with a title.

Source: I was there when it started

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I was there. I was there 3000 years ago ... when Reddit took the Rule. I was there the day the strength of men failed.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah shit I didn't know that.

Everyone send it to the negatives!

Edit: I can edit titles!

[–] FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Much better xd

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Shampiss@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

I could be wrong but I can see too much detail consistency to be AI generated. Perhaps it's AI + Photoshop.

I definitely can see one of the vertical wooden beams disappear behind the right elbow, it's subtle but it looks like someone erased a small part of the beam where it touches the elbow

There is a slim shadow cast by the chair on the wooden floor, on the right side of it's silhouette. This feels very real. DSLR cameras can actually produce this effect tue to the few centimeters of distance from the flash source and the camera sensor

But I feel like the same kind of shadow cast by the animal on the chair has a less real feel. Something about the mostly consistent thicnes of the shadow cast by the animal seems off to me, especially on the left side of the frame where this effect sound be reduced. So I think the chair and deck could be real, and the animal is likely edited.

The smoke looks fake to me. There is a large cloud of smoke coming from the direction of the animal's wrist and not from the cigarette. It also looks like it's too much smoke to realistically come from an idle cigarette

The animal is either a really good prop or really good Photoshop skills.

I'd say most likely it's AI + Photoshop. But it could also be just really good AI.

Ok now that I've seen this, will I die in 7 days?

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Can she ddos 👀