this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics, Gun Control, Single Payer Healthcare and Free Abortions for All!

589 readers
2 users here now

We like leftists and liberals.

We want to ban all guns.

We want free healthcare.

We want UBI.

We don't mind being taxed.

We want to give everyone a free abortion!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To my knowledge, the concept of "conservatism" is the will to conserve, preserve past values that are seen as superior. While I don't agree with this either, this community has almost exclusively posts about fearing new things and trying to show them as evil. Evil migrants, evil new generations, evil new sexualities, whatever.

I do not see any "values" in it, only fear. Rejecting migrants is not based on morals or values that are rational, but on fear. Same for the rest. Which leads to the question, what is the point of this community? It does not lead to debate, people calling it out as fascism on one side (which is quite justified as the root ideas are seemingly identical) and the other side just saying that it's wrong and that's it. There's no debate of values, as there are no values to debate about.

I do not agree with the concept of conservatism, and I couldn't care less if this place is forever doomed to be downvoted in oblivion. But if you actually want to do something else than fear-mongering, even if you insist on talking about conservatism, then maybe it would be a good idea to refocus the community on actual ideas, and not the typical far-right speeches of hatred and fear that already flood a lot of media.

Of course I believe that it would be better to reconsider opinions that basically encourage the worst of humanity; but even aside from that, there is more to do than to replace every possibility of a conversation with the (stereo)typical "immigrants bad, jesus good, gays evil" speech.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Capital c Conservatism is about hierarchy. Hierarchies of race, gender, sexuality, or whatever. Any category imaginable must fit into an order with some on the top who rule over the masses at the bottom. Egalitarian ideals like democracy are disgusting to the Conservative, unless the franchise is exclusive to the "right" people.

God, guns, country, freedom, and capitalism are trends that come and go, but from Edmond Berk to Jordan Peterson, hierarchy is the throughline.

[–] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

This is just overwhelmingly false on just about every manner. Try getting your information from somewhere other than r/politics

[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ideally Conservatism should be about being reserved/realistic and Liberalism should be about being optimistic/hopeful. Kind of like finding balance between art and science if that matters any sense.

Let's take imagination for example. A liberal view would be too help everyone that comes to America looking for help. A conservative view would be America can't just have an open border and let in everyone from every country. These are both rational views. Ideally both sides would compromise and find balance somewhere in the middle to help as many imagrants as is reasonably possible. Sadly that's not the case.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's hard to compromise with people who's only response to anything is to try and yell "racism" as loud as possible

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When someone largely supports programs that primarily exacerbate ethnic, minority, or racial disparity. What's the correct terms?

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The correct answer is to take a long, hard look at why you're so obsessed with people's skin color

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, that's the question we want to know about you. Why do you all enact policies that focus so much on hurting people who share ethnicities, skin colors, etc. That's the question. That's why I asked you what the correct term is. But you don't have an answer. Just straw men and deflection.

[–] TJD@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We arent focused on skin color. You're just the ones picking everything apart based on it, and acting like everyone else must be just as obsessed as you are.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then why does popular conservative policy consistently disparaged certain skin colors and ethnicities so commonly. It couldn't happen just by chance or accident. The rates that it's happening aren't coincidence. So someone sure is. And it's sure popular with conservatives. That's interesting right?

[–] TJD@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, your obsession with race, and assumptions that everyone else just must be as obsessed as you is the only interesting thing here

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How does that work? I'm supposedly somehow obsessed with race simply because we notice that your policies highly negatively impact certain groups more than others. And you aren't, even though the people you vote for and the policies you support are responsible for it. I'd really like to see a good explanation for this. Fingers crossed.

[–] TJD@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The explanation is that I don't give a fuck about race, and don't consider disparate outcome to be an issue, nor a symptom of disparate policy. You're the one who's decided that race is what you want to obsess over. Not me

[–] Fal@yiffit.net -1 points 2 years ago

I don’t give a fuck about race, and don’t consider disparate outcome to be an issue, nor a symptom of disparate polic

So if the effects of a policy result in disparate outcomes, that's totally fine with you? Explain how that's not racist

[–] PizzaMane@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

with the (stereo)typical “immigrants bad, jesus good, gays evil” speech.

That middle part has all but vanished here. We can't have compassion for migrants because we have "limited resources" and clearly they're all just bad people (totally unrelated to their skin color they'll tell you). They gladly elect politicians that destroy the social safety net for the poor.

The only thing even remotely related to Jesus being here is supply side Jesus.

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You have a weird view if you still think all conservatives are christians. Hell, have I posted a single christian thing here?

I think your problem is you have this inaccurate preconceived notion, and its just not jiving with what you see.

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Note: I'm the main poster, and head mod. I'm trying my best, but I'm kind of a fuck up, and have a hard time explaining myself well.

When you're posting news articles, it's usually about the stuff that happened recently. Combined with "Not all progress is good progress", it's basically indistinguishable from "fearing new things". But fair point, and I've been trying to find good stuff happening, like the rates of gun ownership going up, and high school skeet shooting clubs. I'll give it more thought on what quality content actually looks like. In the meantime, I'll keep going.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Please keep going! I don't identify as conservative, but I do have a view or two, and it's important to speak out.

[–] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just declaring that everyone you disagree with has no values doesn't make it so.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then what ARE the values of conservatism?

[–] TJD@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

That highly depends on the individual.