this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
536 points (97.5% liked)

Comic Strips

18708 readers
1686 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Actually, there does seem to be a pixel to reality and existence according to physics, the Planck Length, and the guy (Max Planck) came up with it around the turn of the 20th century, from the math of observing the behavior of light in matter glowing from heat, aka black body radiation. He was also able to deduce Planck Time and Planck Energy.

We can't see it, though, it's smaller to a proton than a proton is to us.

[–] Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I can see it. I squinted.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

And notably, Plank really wanted to be wrong. He didn't want that to be true, it was just a crutch to make the math work out.

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] drislands@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I think that I could easily comprehend any idea, as long as I carefully read about it.

...then I see stuff like this and realize there are ideas so far beyond my current understanding that I feel like I'd need a PhD to wrap my head around them.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not really. The more correct terminology in the comic should have been 'voxels' (volumetric pixels). But it's definitely talking about matter quantization.

The holographic principle (a) is far from being strongly indicated for non-black hole circumstances, and (b) only relates to how 4 dimensional coordinates might map to two dimensional foundations.

It has more to do with spacetime than matter.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought the joke was that he needed better glasses

[–] AlolanYoda@mander.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought the joke was that he's a character in a comic strip on our screens and is therefore literally composed of pixels

[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I thought the joke was that we are also characters in a comic strip one more simulation removed, and therefore we are also all composed of pixels

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why wouldn't they be vector images?

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

We can never understand His (the artist, that is) will.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Cause then the joke would only work on the artist's computer

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because they need to be interacted with and in the most extreme cases you can't track state changes for mathematically real curves without infinite precision.

So even if you start out with something that can be described using a continuous/wave like function, at the point of interaction it would need to be quantized to a discrete unit so you could track how free agents independent of the determining function might alter it.

Of course, if you want to be memory efficient, you'd also throw away that conversion to discrete units if the information about the interaction was erased, as you no longer still need the conversion to track state changes.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

I reread the comic 3 times before realizing it is "Dr. Professor" and not "Or processor"