this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23218 readers
2 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Can't wait to see their revenue tank now that people would rather stop paying than be clowned on this hard.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is so efficient!

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't understand: why would you pay for the check mark and than hide it?

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

Because of people dunking on you with "this mf paid for twitter" memes

[–] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm also confused, what's the point of a check mark if you hide it? Just paying Twitter for fun?

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Now I have an idea: with the check mark come other privileges like pooling, appearing further up in the feed and stuff, I'm not sure exactly. But that might be a reason to pay for and than people feel ashamed and want to hide it.

[–] beef_curds@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

You could actually tell who a lot of the hidden checks were because they were ranked high up in the replies but had practically no engagement.

[–] imikoy@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think these were implemented not too long after the introduction of the subscription?

https://www.pcmag.com/explainers/what-is-x-premium-plus-subscription-how-much

[–] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, I wasn't aware of these. Makes a lot of sense people want more eyeballs on their tweets without people knowing they pay for them.