this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
31 points (97.0% liked)

Global News

4655 readers
382 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Leading barrister warns that the kit – used to support gender-questioning children – is likely to be in breach of equality laws and could violate pupils’ rights

Archived version: https://archive.ph/jT7GK

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The new legal analysis by Monaghan was commissioned by a family in Brighton who are arguing that their child’s school helped their child to socially transition without their consent, because it was using the toolkit. The family wrote to the council on Friday threatening possible legal action if it does not withdraw the guidance within two weeks.

The child’s mother, who asked not to be named in order to protect the identity of her child, told the Observer: “Our child was socially ­transitioned at school by a group of teachers who are quite active in the trans rights arena, despite our child’s complex mental health needs, trauma and autism.”

She said she and her husband “thought we had agreed a unique plan with the head” that the school should support only what she called a “pre-transition phase” until the child left secondary school. Instead, she said, they had been “shocked” to discover the school had supported their child socially transitioning. The family is now estranged from their child.

Seriously? You're so disgusted by your child identifying as something other than their assigned gender at birth (often shortened to AGAB) that you've lost the ability to love and give them affection? The alternative is that you've been so shitty to your child as a result of their desire to be different from their AGAB that you've driven them away and they're no longer able to show you love and affection. Either way, you're the asshole here.

Edit: For Americans, because I had to look this up: secondary school is similar to middle/high school (in the US, middle school is generally 11~13yrs old, high school is typically 14~18). So they're basically saying that their kid isn't allowed to social transition until they're an adult and the parents can no longer legally control what their child does with their life.

Edit 2: decided to change the wording to try and be a bit more accommodating. Originally I had used phrases like, "their birth gender" and "birth sex" because I didn't want to confuse people who weren't aware of the nuance or terminology associated with "assigned gender at birth", and because personally, phrasing things that way doesn't really bother me and so I struggle to see the point. Still, I'm changing it because I want to make sure I don't unintentionally cause someone dysphoria.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're reading a lot between the lines there. I would be concerned if I had a child with special needs whom I had discussed a plan with the school but they had just done something else anyway. Are you saying parents shouldn't be involved with discussions about their childs care? We can't know all the details here and jumping to conclusions about the parents motivation seems premature here.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

re you saying parents shouldn't be involved with discussions about their childs care?

I'm not op but absolutely yeah if the kid doesn't involve their parents it's for a good reason. They're not reading very much between the lines, when kids are "estranged" from their parents it's always the parents' fault - and even if this particular case was the 0.0001% of times where it wasn't, that wouldn't impact what was the right thing for teachers etc to do.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might think differently if the estrangement had been driven by the teachers. The article isn't clear on the timeline. I guess it's for the courts to rule on now.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's pretty ridiculous to think that that is remotely likely. Teachers can't just convince a kid to cut off their parents when there aren't already extremely serious issues in the home, it's not realistic.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're right of course they're have never been any cases of teachers taking advantage of their position of trust over vulnerable pupils. It's always a failing of the parents. /s

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Don't conflate being a supportive and trusted adult as a child navigates their identity with sexual abuse you piece of shit.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, show me an example of teachers convincing kids to abandon their family then, since you seen to think there are so many

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean just googling "teachers who have eloped with students UK" will give you a depressingly long list of examples.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is your job to support your claims not everyone else's.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Fine:

https://metro.co.uk/2023/11/26/teacher-eloped-15-year-old-now-working-baker-19881223/amp/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11390339/amp/RE-teacher-50-struck-leaving-wife-pupil-married-two-children-with.html

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/re-teacher-49-marries-ex-24590117.amp

From the search page. But for a wider view of the times teachers have exerted undue influence over children in their care: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/jan/16/teachers-accused-relationship-pupils-five-years mentions 1000 teachers have been accused of undue influence over a five year period.

I'm not saying the teachers in this case had any undue intentions (the court will be in a far better place to assess the facts than random internet commentators). However it should be clear that teachers can influence children to do something against the wishes of their parents, unless you posit in all these cases it was still somehow the parents fault.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

other than what they were born as

assigned at birth; let's not acquiesce some doctor with a crank habit on 2 hours sleep is correct in what they say on government paperwork off a 2 second glance at baby genitals.

Either way, you’re the asshole here.

Big yeah.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In this house we treat medical professionals with respect

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

I worded it that way because not everyone knows what AGAB, AMAB, and AFAB mean. I agree with your sentiment though.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Equality Act affords protection not only to trans-identified young people, but also to those who are gender-critical.

It shouldn't, because that second group doesn't deserves rights.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I appreciate the sentiment, but even those who seek to take everything away from me deserve rights. I hate "gender-critical" shmoes with all my heart, but even they should have rights.

Now, whether "being allowed to have a say in someone else's gender" should be a right.... Fuck no

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate “gender-critical” shmoes with all my heart, but even they should have rights.

Not to be "gender critical" they shouldn't.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago