Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.
This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
Is this an update to this story?
The way it's written made it sound like the application was voted down or stalled somehow, but it's not real clear, and it looks to me like there wasn't a specific objection made (which would usually mean it continues). Right? Or am I misunderstanding?
Yes, it was basically a meeting to decide if the formal vote would pass. Two thirds of the members agreed with it, while 5 members disagreed.
It can still be brought to the formal vote by any Council member, but since the US is likely one of the countries that disagreed, and they have a veto power, it's doomed to fail.
Got it. Yeah, I reread it and it finally started to click; IDK why they wrote it in such a convoluted manner. So presumably the exact breakdown of voting is secret for some reason, but we know 10 members voted yes, and at least one of the permanent members was in the 5 that voted no -- so it goes nowhere now. I wonder who might have done the veto.