this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
90 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10431 readers
535 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal Liberal government is finally making good on a years-old election campaign pledge, committing Monday to allocate $1 billion over five years to fund a new national school food program.

The funding, to be included in the upcoming April 16 budget, will launch with the aim of expanding existing school food programs, providing meals to an additional 400,000 Canadian kids a year.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland made the announcement in Scarborough, backed by members of cabinet and caucus as part of their latest pre-budget press tour.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is great and I want the funding to follow through but I can't help thinking delivering on a campaign promise this late and this close to an election is secretly more about the votes.

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'll take the end result of this one either way.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really, ya think?

This has been the Liberal playbook for as long as I can remember:

  1. During the campaign, promise all sorts of progressive goodies (pharmacare, electoral reform, whatever)
  2. Flank the NDP by making swing voters think "What's the difference between the two, anyway?"
  3. Get elected
  4. Do nothing progressive for four years, instead:
  5. Strike up a bunch of commissions, committees and studies for the progressive stuff you'd said you were going to do. Those commissions will either die a quiet death in bickering and obstructionism, or deliver their recommendations just before you call the next election
  6. On the other hand, do engage in the neoliberal stuff you really wanted to do: cut taxes for the rich, maybe buy a pipeline for Alberta, sell off some assets, do some expensive public-private partnerships
  7. Call an election and this time, pinkie-swear, we'll really do pharmacare, or willd o daycare right, or will have an answer for housing. Just trust us this time, mmmkay?

This is also while the Liberals don't really mind the Conservatives, but are terrified of the NDP and truly pissed off at the Bloc: they're okay with switching chairs every four to twelve years, but if the NDP gets traction it means that the Liberals might be away from the levers of power permanently. This is why electoral reform died: meaningful electoral reform would mean no more Liberal (or Conservative) majorities with ~35% of the vote.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You forgot "Get caught redhanded buttering the bread of Liberal cronies and somehow the media let them squirm out of it" about 2 years in.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

about the votes.

This is my surprised face.

[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Canada is finally catching up to Finland on this.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Canada is finally catching up to Québec on this.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This should be handled by the provinces.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

A lot of things should be handled by the provinces, but unfortunately there are premiers who care more about backroom deals with billionaires than administering social programs. I don't mind the federal government stepping in to run social programs if the premiers have abandoned their province. It's kind of hard to say the government is overstepping their boundaries by feeding children.

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Glad it's not just more money for Dougie to "lose".

Not saying I like how it's being done though.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That’s how I feel too.

I don’t like the federal government pretending to be provincial and the provincial governments blaming them for everything.

If the premiers don’t want to run provinces, then dissolve the provinces.

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe, but they aren't getting it done so screw em.