this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2888 readers
247 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Natural gas is somewhere between equally as bad and worse for climate change compared to coal. It's just harder to measure since most of the impact comes from leaking methane into the atmosphere, which most energy companies don't have to monitor or measure. We shouldn't be investing in it.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This 'plan' is very Orwellian. The idea that other countries are going to replace local coal usage with Canadian natural gas usage rather than simply adding more capacity is already laughable. Pretending that, even if that did happen, Canada would be given partial credit is just not being honest. Canada exports natural gas right now. Are we getting any sort of credit for that?

[–] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

I don't know about "credit" but Canada does get lots of international recognition for its fossil fuels exports. If we replace the carbon tax with new carbon subsidies I imagine we can garner even more such attention pretty quickly.