Headline should specify that it's a prop from a movie, not an actual piece of the ship
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
56 points (96.7% liked)
Moving to piefed.lemmy.fan/c/weird_news - Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'
1617 readers
2 users here now
Weird News is moving to https://piefed.lemmy.fan/c/weird_news on Friday June 27th. Please subscribe to the new community before then.
Rules:
-
News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.
-
Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.
-
Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.
-
Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.
Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.
Communities We Like:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
'Titanic' not the Titanic
People just don't read enough anymore to read titles correctly.
- One of the people who didn't read the title correctly.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic
it has never been "The Titanic"
I didn't say that was it's title but general when referring to something you can use "the" proceeding it, like "the Brooklyn bridge". Or like "door from THE titanic sold for..." You wouldn't say "door from titanic sold for ..."
When you WOULD phrase it like that is when 'Titanic' is a title and you are referencing it in a headline.
I knew this from basic grammar lessons in grade school. I didn't even graduate high school. I'm a bit sad this needs to be explained.
Maybe if you're American 🤢
It's a Us based publication you silly goose, why wouldn't they use proper grammar for that context?
Get out of here with that incivility
Part of me wants to buy it to see if Leo and Kate could have just shared it.
There was a mythbusters episode about that one and they found out that they could have.