this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
261 points (99.2% liked)

News

37007 readers
2228 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Colorado man who helped other rioters drag a police officer into a mob storming the U.S. Capitol was sentenced on Thursday to more than five years in prison for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack.

Jeffrey Sabol ripped a baton from an officer’s hands before pulling another officer into the crowd outside the Capitol, allowing other rioters to assault the officer with weapons.

Sabol, 54, told U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras that he knows he is “100%” guilty and would have apologized directly to the officers whom he attacked if they had attended the hearing.

“I accept whatever it is you hand me,” Sabol said. “I’ll be honest: I deserve it.”

The judge sentenced Sabol to five years and three months behind bars. He’ll get credit for the three years and two months that he has already spent in jail since his arrest.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stevedidwhat_infosec 99 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Assaulting a police officer in an attempt to overthrow the current government: 5 years

Having weed: 5 years

👍 k.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Not to mention the fact of how different the experience in jail is, for these two cases.

Hell, the whole ordeal is...

The way the system treats you. Starting from the police taking you in, until you get to sit in a cell, you will know exactly how much the system values you as a human being.

The terrorist will feel like doing a very long detention in high school. Like, the grown ups are angry at you, but obviously don't hate you. The guards may even congratulate him, when he'll get out.

On the other hand, the weed guy is more likely to lose the last drop of faith he had in the system, if he ever gets out of prison again. A big if, nowadays...

It's all in all pretty rotten

I'm typing this while in bed, but nevertheless i feel like the only logical thing, when you really think about it, would be to really fight the fucking system!

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago (1 children)

drag a cop into a mob during an attempt to overthrow the government.

five years.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Amazing how lenient we are with people staging a coup.

We were lenient with the Confederates too.

Always leniency when it's white people...

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unless they are hippies. Basically the "in" vs. "outside" of group dynamics - like fellow authoritarian vs. liberal.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

-- former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So many things to come out of that administration... including admirers like Roger Stone who then turned it into a blueprint for Trump to follow to make authoritarianism great again! :-(

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Roger Stone goes beyond "admirer." When you get Nixon's face tattooed on your back, it's because you're also jerking off to him every night.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Bold of us here to presume that he could ever get it up but yeah, it's definitely some kind of infatuation - "when I grow up, I wanna be just like daddy Nixon!":-P

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sabol, 54, told U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras that he knows he is “100%” guilty and would have apologized directly to the officers whom he attacked if they had attended the hearing.

“I accept whatever it is you hand me,” Sabol said. “I’ll be honest: I deserve it.”

Well at least he didn’t go down kicking and screaming like a dope.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

The problem is that they keep acting contrite in court and then go back to their old ways when they get out.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Look, these fuckers gave me PTSD. I don't mean, "Someone hassled me on FB!", PTSD. I mean the real deal. My hatred and anger and fear are still with me, making me act irrationally all this time later. So...

This worthless article doesn't state what the man was charged with, and I'd bet that makes the difference. I find the charge is what's causing many of these light sentences. OTOH, the judges have been far more lenient than the prosecutors, so there's that.