this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

New York Times gift articles

1177 readers
31 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m not really sure how I feel about this..

On the one hand if they are spending more than they take in to handle cash, that’s obviously broken, so the move is logical.. but aren’t there alternatives that don’t disadvantage people who don’t have plastic options for whatever reason?

Like idk, making them free to enter and paid for entirely by business taxes or something, the way they should be? I realize they are basically self-funding a lot of what they do by charging admission, but that is still an unfair barrier on public enjoyment of a public good. And so unnecessary.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Cash should always be an option, especially when dealing with a government service, ESPECIALLY when it is a critical government service like NATURE ACCESS.

Not to mention the fact that existing in nature should be free.