this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

6903 readers
697 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aew360@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bro he’s got like eleven lambos bro he wears his Rolex in the shower bro it’s got real diamonds bro he has all the video game consoles and extra controllers bro

[–] spez@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

brooooooooo

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That Wojack is brilliant.

Also, I wonder what physical shape the uncle is in? I'm betting terrible.

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

What shape? Alpha, obviously. Pointy up top and progressively wider as you go down.

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lmao. So his logic was

my wife is too ugly to fuck

He deserves the divorce, good for her.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Everyone looks the same in the dark. Pretty people are nice to look at. Marry for things that take up more than 20 minutes(maybe) of your week. Sad they didn't realize this.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Visual communication is incredibly important. I think I’ve had sex in the dark like… less than 1% of the time. You’re either trying to keep up a rapport to maintain their enthusiastic future availability or emotionally invested and attempting to maintain reciprocity. Unless you’re both fairly charming and willing to lower your standards, lights are worth keeping on. Sex is just as intrinsically tied to the social contract as anything else.

That said, yeah, marry for personality imo.

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It could have been fine if he didn't have a "change the rules because I'm losing" mentality.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The rise and fall of this grift has been such a gift to me. It has introduced some of the goofiest characters and goofiest feuds. I have had so many delightful conversations stemming from this shit. What a time to be alive.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

this grift has fallen? seems alive and kicking to me

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I still hear chuds at work talk about his “wisdom”.

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Really? What line of work are you in, if you don't mind me asking.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I am in the electricity business. ⚡️⚡️

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah jokes on him 40 year old polyamorous women pull like crazy

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

We are friends with a 53 year old widow, she is physically unremarkable, chubby, has kids in college. She has sex with multiple guys a week and details her adventures to my wife over text. These guys range from 25 to 44 yrs old. Women will always get laid more than men. If they want it, they can have it.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Yeah I’m a 29 year old woman and there’s a woman in her 50s that I’ve been making out with. It’s kinda weird that her kids are my age, but she’s hot af so… and yeah she’s chubby, but it works for her.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Women will always get laid more than men.

If we discount homosexual relationships (since the conversation focuses on heterosexuals), for a woman to have sex, there needs to be a man to have sex with her, and vice versa, so men and women should get laid equally.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Uh no. It's not 1-1, it's 1-to-many.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

Due to Fisher's Principle, we know that there's roughly as many women as men. So why don't you go and take a population of 5 men and 5 women, and show how they can be partnered up in such a way that each woman is on average connected to more men than vice versa. You'll quickly find it impossible, and that's because it is mathematically impossible.