politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Agreed! Why are people so upset that Trump took over a Black Church while Promoting how Black People love him while talking to an All White crowd?
Except it wasn't an all White crowd. The Youtube video I posted of that event shows a different story than this pitiful waste of time article.
You're right. There were 8 black people in attendance, but only 1 of them lived in the area.
If they have to bus in black people to go this black church, how many of the white people do you really think lived in that area?
I dunno what about this claim seems factual to you guys... it's like you're grasping at straws.
https://ktvz.b-cdn.net/2024/06/Trump-church-Detroit-CNN.jpg
You guys are getting played by the media. They're providing images at certain angles and certain parts of the building instead of giving you a zoomed out version. I can't even find anything to provide a zoomed out version. There's also photos that are taken before the event began that are being used as proof. It's pretty embarrassing.
It's like that CIA persuasion tactic they used, where they bring in 19 CIA agents, pretending to not be CIA or in any way related... and the 20th person is some random (the test subject). They pull up a square, all 19 agents say it's a triangle... and the 20th person, the one that's getting tested, has no other option but to be persuaded that it is a triangle, not the actual square that their eyes can clearly see.
It's a square. Not a triangle.
You just posted a heavily cropped and compressed picture of a handful of black people, whereas there are pictures in this thread showing wide shots of hundreds of white people. What are you trying to prove here?
This guy lol. Completely ignores every wide shot available of the event, complains there are no wide shots, then uses a tight cropped photo from something. Then goes on about some cia conspiracy.
How do you come up with this crap? Lol
Is it fake media? From the mainstream?
Well it's kind of interesting that social media like TikTok and Telegram tends to challenge the mainstream narrative of both sides. I'm very wary of anything from mainstream media, honestly.
Ok guy. You have fun in your little world. Peace.