this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
-6 points (20.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !teslamotors@lemmy.zip

1754 readers
1 users here now

This community has moved to:

!teslamotors@lemmy.zip

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ambitious marketing. I think they're still closer to self driving than competing systems, but "full self driving" is definitely a misleading name for what the software can currently do. We are gradually seeing more drives with zero disengagements, so the technology is slowly getting there.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Zero disengagement is exactly what the drivers should be doing in its current state and why it shouldnt be called full self driving.

Ah, I think we are using term "disengagement" slightly differently. A disengagement generally refers to a human driver disengaging FSD as a manual override, not a human driver being disengaged with the task of driving.