this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
140 points (99.3% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, or something like that parenti

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HexBroke@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

It's not actually the worst economist article I've ever read

Instead Mr Xi wants state power to accelerate advanced manufacturing industries, which will in turn create high-productivity jobs, make China self-sufficient and secure it against American aggression. China will leapfrog steel and skyscrapers to a golden era of mass production of electric cars, batteries, biomanufacturing and the drone-based “low-altitude economy”.

Not only will China escape dependence on Western technology, but it will control much of the key intellectual property in new industries and charge rents accordingly. Multinationals will come to China to learn, not teach.

xigma-male

However, Mr Xi’s plan is fundamentally misguided. One flaw is that it neglects consumers. To restore confidence amid the property slump and thereby boost consumer spending requires stimulus.

A legitimate problem hence the approach to dual circulation

To induce consumers to save less requires better social security and health care, and reforms that open up public services to all urban migrants.

This is also true - China's healthcare system is grim (thanks deng-cowboy) and the hukou system is in dire need of reform. But the healthcare system has been steadily improving since 2012 and particularly with Covid. There is also talk of hukou reform but this would be very significant and not something to undertake before the real estate market has been stabilised.

"Sure, China is becoming a global superpower and displacing the US, but at what cost!?"