this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
110 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

citation 4 links to a 61-page CIA report. It was added by user Umfront. The part that they "cited" seems to be on page 30. "forgotten" is not used in the report lol

I'm just confused. Who the fuck has time to read a 61 page report from the CIA to highlight the most useless part of it and then proceed to misquote it while editing it onto Wikipedia???

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] happybadger@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The user "happybadger" on the online forum Hexbear.net also developed the same design but slightly better and in 1950. This was forgotten until 2024.

Perhaps, but Oscar de Jarjayes developed the same design but even better, on December 26, 1755.

load more comments (2 replies)