this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
1130 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

27945 readers
343 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I agree with work life balance, but working at meta for 2-3 years for $300k might be worth the sacrifice

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 60 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If I were a kid right out of college, I'd honestly consider it. The key is truly knowing what you're getting into. Companies gobble up those kids out of college because they're naiive, and they want to prove themselves. MAANG knows that and take advantage of it. As long as you're aware of that going into it, and plan to use them too, then go for it. Just don't plan to be a lifer, know that they don't care about you going in.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago (1 children)

MAANG

deadname the pricks, you're already doing it for google. it's facebook

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

MAAAN would be a much better acronym though

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's just, like, your opinion...

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

I was thinking MAANA

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

Get in with the full idea of being a parasite, doing the barest minimum work possible while getting friendly with higher ups. It's not like doing a good job there would be better for the customers/end users anyway

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

MAANG sounds like a Superman's villain

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I thought that it became MANGA when it changed from FAANG?

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

$300k might be worth the sacrifice

Right? I realistically just need 150k/yr to be stable in my area, I could chuck the other 150k/yr into savings and quit after 3 years with 450k in the bank

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If I rember right google had an AI driving division that had huge cash incentives based on performance metrics that essentially crashed and burned because they hit targets so fast that main time retired for life in like a year or two

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That sounds interesting, seeing as I am 'somewhat' familiar with google's self driving car program right now, and very little about it is crashing or burning.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Self-driving probably was not the one successful AI program

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 4 points 2 years ago

3 years can be a very long time, though.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The hell? I live two years for 100k CHF. Lucerne, Switzerland, flat in the historic, more expensive part.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 2 years ago

My soul is worth more than that, and I don't even have one.