this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024

51 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers

1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

51

This Wikipedia article has been in existence since February (en.wikipedia.org)

submitted 1 year ago by infuziSporg@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

And it was created by a sockpuppet account who was banned for account abuse. Yet the article remains, very close to its original form, because the libs unconditionally respect what is extant.

There's a nonzero chance that someone finds out what a "sigma male" is via Wikipedia now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

I think the article should be available, but someone should do the work to include more critical sources and remove some of the flowery language

theres an article on homeopathy for instance, it should be treated like that.