this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
212 points (94.2% liked)

Privacy

6936 readers
55 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correction: they are encrypted. Not well, but cut them some slack, it's a small startup.

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No they arent. They are obfuscated at best. The images are just saved without .jpg extension, and slapping one behind is enough

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's encrypted, but at the same level as everything else the user has access to. So, if your computer is stolen and they can't log in, they can't access it.

Basically, encrypted, just like any other user file.

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you forgot to mention if the hard drive is encrypted than your statement is true ( in the case for example bitlocker...) but if thats not the case then anyone can just force permissions for that drive and read and write anything.

Bitlokcer would be default active on new windows 11 devices if they all had tpm 2.0 chips ( most of the windows 10 users dont have that featzre ) so bitlocker is out of that case.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The drive is encrypted on W11, if you tamper with the install to allow non TPM requirement then I don't think you can blame anybody if there are consequences. You can install a random exe from the internet, give it admin rights too, that's also on you.

This is a shit show already, no need to make things up to make it worse really.

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Still tpm 2.0 should never be required in the first place. But yeah windows is already a shitshow