this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
815 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39878 readers
371 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] direfield@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Huh why ? This doesn't make sense

[–] spoonful@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The article is a bit misleading. He wants to get rid of block for stronger mute as you can get around block by logging out.

The counter argument is that block is still useful because I block someone I want zero interaction with that person and people are too lazy to log out anyway so it kinda works in practice.

I'm not sure why is he stirring shit up. The block feature is on point with free speech philosophy he trying to push. If anything he should be making blocking etc. More powerful.

[–] Edo78@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago

Actually he wants to get rid of "blocking public posts"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)