this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
212 points (99.1% liked)

politics

25420 readers
2525 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fact that we have people on minor drug offenses serving years in prison, but these assholes are negotiating when, if ever, they're going to maybe serve a few-month sentence is such an outrageous failure of the justice system, I feel like there's really no way to solve any of these issues without just tearing the whole institution down and rebuilding it from the ground up with new, reasonable rules.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean we could have a peaceful revolution like they did in Europe 5-10 years ago. They pretty much removed everybody and voted everybody new in. The most peaceful revolution on books.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the info I'll look into it.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, but we're talking about america here.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That "we" is doing a lot of heavy lifting

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He’s awaiting appeal. The judge determines incarceration, house arrest, or a bail option during that time. That’s why he’s reporting to jail, and not prison.

This doesn’t affect his sentence. Unless he wins appeal, he will be serving time in prison.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A normal person would've been cuffed and led off to the cells pretty much immediately after sentencing, not scheduled a month afterward.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not true. It’s a nonviolent crime. House arrest is more common than incarceration while awaiting appeal.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? Bannon isn't awaiting trial; he's been sentenced. It's right there in the headline, FFS!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He is awaiting his appeal. That’s how sentencing during appeal works.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Normal people sit in a cell serving their sentence while awaiting appeal. Only elite fascist fucks get the kid-glove treatment and run around free until the judges can't come up with a fig leaf to keep entertaining their lawyers' bullshit motions anymore.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That’s not the case with most nonviolent crimes. There has to be reason for the judge to think that they’re at risk of committing more crime while awaiting appeal.