this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
566 points (96.9% liked)

US Authoritarianism

1292 readers
1 users here now

ChonkyOwlbear is an Illegitimate Usurper

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So US citizens have no say in picking the legislative, the judiciary and the executive branches.

How's it the democratic beacon of freedom again?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could run yourself in the cases where a candidate is unopposed. People there have the right to vote, to run as a candidate etc. I guess they could have some sort of law to force participation but I think that would be counter to idea of freedom instead of helping it.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are the barriers of entry into the running?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

5k is a decent barrier to stop masses of people running, but surely some people can afford the cost.

I'm just trying to understand the unopposed elections.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are people who can afford the cost of running, but then also consider they are paying money to do what is effectively a full time job of campaigning, let alone then committing to a 2-6 year (depending) term.

Whatever job they had to make the money to run they'd likely have to quit.

Imagine a job that required people to pay to apply.

You can see how the system is designed to be a barrier to poor and unrepresented people.

So otherwise people rely on the tools and resources consoldiated under the two major parties. And those cases they are never in any position to make demands on the system: they have to follow the party line that funded and supported their campaign.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can see how the system is designed to be a barrier to poor and unrepresented people.

Just poor people. You can be a black trans woman who is also disabled and a lesbian but if you can put up the fee you can run. And if you were poor enough for the fee to be a meaningful barrier, the $174k/year you make if elected is more than you were making from your old job, and so long as you save a bit of that gives you enough of a cushion to find a new one afterward (plus being a former senator opens more career doors for you).

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

That $174k is for some major federal offices.

Your state level legislators are pulling like $40k. Those are going to be the bulk of your uncontested races.

Some positions are outright uncompensated but the official has a daily stipend of $50-$150 they can be reimbursed for their spending while on official business, so like: gas and food.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Usually you don't finance your own campaign. You ask around for donations in concentric circles of difficulty. You should read Run for Something by Amanda Litman it's all about how and why you should run for office.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Some can afford it offhand but I'd imagine others gather it from community of supporters