this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
593 points (99.7% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

What do you think happened exactly?

[–] YuccaMan@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

https://www.liberationnews.org/tiananmen-the-massacre-that-wasnt-2/

Edit: the other source I was looking for

https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php

The thing to get is that there was no massacre on the square, and in fact there's no verifiable evidence that anybody died there at all that day. Many people did die elsewhere, in street clashes with soldiers, after demonstrators killed and burned a few of them.

I would like to note also that bringing up events like Tiananmen Square, especially heavily propagandized and warped versions of them, without an understanding of the complex political context which led up to them, is not a gotcha, it's just ignorant. Not saying you're doing that or that you would do that, but it's something others do frequently when they invoke it round here.

[–] Balefirex@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

US Military Pysops Division literally bragged about how successful they were with Tiananmen in this recruitment video

https://youtu.be/VA4e0NqyYMw

Edit: Found out about this video from this article which was linked on hexbear lol https://www.fridayeveryday.com/how-psy-ops-warriors-fooled-me-about-tiananmen-square-a-warning/

[–] YuccaMan@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Ah, I remember that. Almost feels like the cocky bastards are mocking us at this point.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)