this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
85 points (91.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43810 readers
1 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neko@fishfry.cheese.beer 1 points 2 years ago (23 children)
  1. It's not art
  2. Modern art made by people who actually have marketable skills isn't low effort
[–] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja 12 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It’s not art

I'm old enough to remember three similar statements that are equally untrue:

  • Photography isn't art
  • Photoshop isn't art
  • Video Games aren't art

Eventually, we changed our opinions. The same will happen for generative images. They are art.

[–] Varlus@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As an artist who grew up when those exact same arguments were happening, I've always found it odd people went with the "AI is bad because it's not art" argument. Instead of focusing on something like real people losing their jobs because of it. Which is such more legitimate reasons to hate how AI art is currently being used vs "b-but all you did was type prompts! You didn't spend years learning like a REAL artist!" as if early photography/digital art wasn't given the exact same criticism of "The tech does everything for you"

[–] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja 4 points 2 years ago

Instead of focusing on something like real people losing their jobs because of it.

Ironically, it was the rise of one of those job-killing changes that made it possible for me to get in to a job in art in the first place. I think the same thing will be true for generative images. Some people who relied on the high bar for entry to protect their jobs will lose them, and some people who couldn't get access to those jobs will suddenly find themselves able to enter artistic fields.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)