this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
85 points (91.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43810 readers
1 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] neko@fishfry.cheese.beer 1 points 2 years ago (23 children)
  1. It's not art
  2. Modern art made by people who actually have marketable skills isn't low effort
[โ€“] WackyTabbacy42069@reddthat.com -1 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Literally there's modern art that's just random splotches of paint thrown on a canvas. Both me and a toddler could create that with our skills. Regardless, those random splotches on a canvas are considered art because of the purpose they serve, not its quality

[โ€“] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Rule #1 of contemporary (not modern) art: any time someone says it's just splashes of paint on a canvas, it's almost never just splashes of paint on a canvas. Even something that looks 'simple' like Who's Afraid of Red, Yellow, And Blue III by Barnett Newman, often has an artistic process that goes into it that is so detailed that attempts at restoration that do not reflect how intricate the process is can ruin them.

Also if it's so easy to make paintings that toddlers could make and get them into museums and sell for big bucks, you should do it. Seriously, if it's so easy why aren't you doing it?

[โ€“] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Art, like everything else, is worth what someone will pay for it.

A chimpanzee can sell his art for thousands and get it in a gallery. It is that easy -- if people want it for some reason.

[โ€“] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So if it's easy, why haven't you done it?

[โ€“] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because I feel ashamed enough when I see "artists" put it out there. I'm not planning on being ashamed of myself.

[โ€“] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you could make millions but it's just beneath you?

[โ€“] rikudou@lemmings.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah, most likely not millions (I don't have friends who need to launder money, so only people who actually think random shapes are art would buy). The rest of the comment I agree with, I have second-hand embarrassment every time I see someone praise random shapes.

[โ€“] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Literally anyone who makes any piece of physical art has done more than AI "artists" figuring out the best way to add and remove noise from a noise generating machine trained on the work of actual artists, lmao.

[โ€“] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, no. I would probably say more, but your "lmao" makes me think you're not actually interested.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)