this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
383 points (96.8% liked)

interestingasfuck

1960 readers
1 users here now

Please go to !interestingshare@lemmy.zip

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Well how else would you suggest people come in contact with the wildlife of this world? Which is obviously critical in making people care about protecting it.

Crappy "documentaries" ain't it by the way. Not to mention that zoos also serve a secondary function in providing for rescue animals, and animals otherwise unable to live in the wild. Zoos are not perfect, but are very clearly the best compromise for fostering interest in our wonderful nature in future generations, who probably won't even encounter a horse or cow in real life otherwise.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well how else would you suggest people come in contact with the wildlife of this world?

By going to their habitats?

obviously critical in making people care about protecting it

No. Zoos are not critical in making people care about protecting wildlife.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Taking tourists into natural habitats is way more destructive than having a few specimens on display in artificial habitats.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not talking about tourists viewing exotic animals from far off places, I'm talking about people going into the countryside that's near to them and seeing the wildlife there.

load more comments (2 replies)