this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
142 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Motherfuckers created a rule about how pointing out that overpopulation myths are ecofascistic lobbying is actually "bad faith" somehow so now every post, no matter what it is about, full of "this is why billions must die" bullshit.

There's 500k subscribers btw.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LesbianLiberty@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Reddit communities with 500k subscribers, for better or for worse, can influence culture at large. Making a post to begin a discussion on the potential dangers of such a large community's moderation policies is not an unworthy endeavor.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (26 children)

Making a post to begin a discussion on the potential dangers of such a large community's moderation policies is not an unworthy endeavor.

This doesn't seem like such a post. Firstly, it doesn't seem to me like beginning a discussion on a Reddit community's moderation policies here has any worth. It might have worth if the discussion was begun in the Reddit community itself but I can't see any worth beginning a discussion here.

Secondly, this post doesn't seem like an effort to begin an earnest discussion about potential dangers of moderation policies at all, it seems more like a mindless "ZOMG1!!!!1 LOOK AT THE FASCISTS ON REDDIT!!! WERE AMAZING AND THEIR STOOPID!!!"

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It has been brought up multiple times there but it's banned outright as it's being "bad faith".

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not suggesting doing that, I'm just contrasting the difference in value of discussions in the different fora.

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the "value of discussion" you see here is a direct consequence of the fact that normal discussion cannot be had about the topic over there.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the "value of discussion" you see here

I don't see any value though, that's the point.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hogs dont tend to appreciate fine cuisine

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)