this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
358 points (90.0% liked)

memes

16728 readers
1907 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Though I use GIMP

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't get the AI hate. Why is photoshop, a tool made by an evil corporation, so much better?

[–] byroon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Substitute GIMP for photoshop. Also you can pirate photoshop

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

There are open source AI models such as Stable Diffusion.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since when? Everything it does is unintuitive and clunky, not to mention slow.

Classic Photoshop fanboy

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social -2 points 1 year ago

GIMP is shit, use Krita instead

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's art without an artist. Or maybe rather more accurately it's huge amounts of other peoples art put through a blender and reconstituted into a solid block of art product. Actually, yeah, it's the equivalent of spam, the tinned meat product. It has its uses, but it doesn't taste good to most people, and there are a few die hard fans.

Doing image editing/compositing/art yourself is just more genuine. It doesn't have to be the adobe product, there's tons of editors and art programs out there. Stumbling through gimp patching and editing a meme together gives the end result some charm imo. YMMV, but that's how I see it and I think a lot of others do to. Where AI generated imagery shines is utilitarian areas. Generating tokens for npcs in ttrpgs, rapidly iterating through concepts for a design, that sort of thing.

[–] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

I draw and use AI in the same way I'll Google an image to get what my nonvisual memory is asking to see. Once I see it, I'm good to draw it.

FWIW, DALL-E2 was much much better than DALL-E3 at this task. It was enough to satisfy your imagination without being good enough to really look like "art". It was mass produced "art".

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There are artists, but they are using math instead of photoshop.

The math behind machine learning is more beautiful than most art.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but the machine learning is the art, not what it produces. Don't get me wrong, generative ai is super cool. However, justifiably or no, most people don't see someone who just types prompts into generative ai as an artist.