this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
74 points (97.4% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why are you assuming that nuclear has to completely replace all other forms of energy, whether renewable or not, to be worth building?

Death to America

[–] HexBroke@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't - I cut 16 years off the timeline, or about 30 per cent

That's accurate enough for a thought experiment that turns 80 percent of the world's population into China

[–] Hexamerous@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Did your calculation account for the fact that energy and economic growth having an almost 1:1 relation, meaning a compound growth of ~3% economic growth every year will add up quadrupling the energy requirements in 50 years.

elmofire agony-shivering fire

[–] HexBroke@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think that's actually true - it might have been from 1940s USA to the early 1980s but I don't think it holds weight anymore.

For example, if there was total electrification of cars and heating within 5 years, electricity demand would increase unimaginably while GDP would barely move.