this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Doubledee@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is Q supposed to be meaningfully older than Mark? I know the synoptics all are believed to be taking from it, but I don't remember ever being told how distant of a predecessor it was imagined to be.

[โ€“] JamesConeZone@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

I think it's argued to be a sayings text like the Gospel of Thomas compiled in the 40s/50s. I've actually leaned towards scholarship by Mark Goodacre and others who argued against the existence of Q. His books and blogs have more on that, but he's pretty convincing.