this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
542 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

16152 readers
1788 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] azi@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Because we’re precise!

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why km/h (or mph) and not ft/year? Because the numbers have a nicer magnitude then.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't apply here, say for example i have a piece of steel with length 100mm and it stretches 10mm, is mm/mm the strain would be 0.1 mm/mm, in meters it would be 0.1m/m

Really strain is dimensionless but occasionally people add units

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I feel like I should’ve spotted that… they’re the same units. 🤦

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because practicality. Strain generally occurs across mm scales at most for most traditional tensile tests and relevant materials. Normally it's actually much less than mm. Occasionally you see micrometers/micrometers.

[–] azi@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is it more practical when 1 m/m = 1 mm/mm = 1 μm/μm?

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

The original specimens and data are usually in mm, not meters so mm/mm makes more sense than m/m, although you do have a point

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Because excel doesn't have built in unit handling so when you enter in readings from the strain gauge you'll probably enter them in what's being reported.

You can write the units of strain however you like, I often say ul for unitless.