this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
69 points (97.3% liked)

Self-hosting

3585 readers
27 users here now

Hosting your own services. Preferably at home and on low-power or shared hardware.

Also check out:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Album@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (9 children)

At the ever increasing cost of the pi and how limiting it is, the n100 is a no brainer.

[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

At the ever increasing cost of the pi and how limiting it is, the n100 is a no brainer.

Depends on the use case I guess.I prefer to have an ARM based SBC to play with (rather than an Intel based box) to test different Linux distributions and BSD without GUI.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

There's gotta be a bunch of niche cases why a pi is better - but generally...not.

What usecase is arm based linux and bsd all that important? Outside of arm dev - probably not much else.

[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps you are thinking in best and better and what most people want. For me there is something like curiosity (Not very uncommon in the open source world) and learning new things.Besides that I am not very amused about Intel and their Spectre and Meltdown failures which is still not a closed book with new attacks being reported in the news.For hobby and work, computer security and privacy is something that I cannot neglect.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Yep, that's what 'generally' and 'niche' means. The n100 doesnt have hyper threading so isnt subject to that kind of attack - btw the same attack that AMD has been subject to to many times over and over. Not sure what's good on ARM curiosity - still interested to know.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)