this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
152 points (96.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43810 readers
1 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mine is the computer. I continue to be amazed at what we can do with them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 0_0j@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

In Electronics world? Bipolar junction Transistors. Easily.

This led into having portable devices we have today.

Back then people used vacuum tubes for switching and amplification; of which were very expensive to run (used a lot of power when idle, while having a very short lifespan of less than 48 hrs).

I mean, vacuum tubes where phenomenal when they came, allowed first long distance calls in 1915.

Look at my phone now, fits on my hands, and has billions of transistors!

Post script: lately I've been thinking, what if we remove cell towers as middle men? Because nowadays privacy is somewhat dead. People have been using radio frequency for walkie-talkies even before 1st generation communication (1G) was a thing.

This video enlightened my day ๐Ÿ˜Š

It's just a matter of time now

[โ€“] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its crazy that we're now approaching 200 million transistors in a single square millimetre. Boggles the mind.

load more comments (2 replies)