this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
178 points (97.8% liked)

News

1748 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They don't care. The purpose wasn't to charge them, since the powers-that-be already know that protesting isn't a crime.

The purpose was to get them off the scene. It doesn't matter that the charges are automatically dropped, what matters is that they drag the protesters away in that moment.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

And to deter others thinking of protesting. "You can't do this, see?" Historically, that usually works, right? People just settle down and go home?

[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

As long as there’s no consequences for this kind of Pinkerton shit, it’s only going to get worse.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why isn't the very act of disturbing their protest by violence unconstitutional? (Edit: unless the protesters are infringing somebody's right to property ofc)