this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
73 points (96.2% liked)

Futurology

3164 readers
29 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

High energy weapons can destroy mirrors.

Even if the mirrors are capable of reflecting the laser light, they likely unable to reflect two different wavelengths. So two high energy lasers would negate the mirrors effect.

Most of the mirrors able to reflect this are likely to cost more than the drones they would protect.

The best and cheapest strategy would be to fly the drones close to the ground. The closer they are the harder it will be for radar to detect, and lasers to target as there will be more obstacles in the path of the sensors/weapon.

Any sustained major conflict these high energy weapons make a significant impact will likely see drones quickly flying low on the ground. This will make it harder for automated systems to shot, but easier for soldiers with rifles.

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What companies make shotguns and shotgun rounds for the MIC? Inquiring for an amateur day trader friend.

Edit: Does anyone make anti-recoil drones with Spinny bits? asking for a friend... another one.

[–] Graphy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just picture Tom Knapp casually tossing his Benelli into the air then catching it and turning ten drones into orange dust.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

The man was amazing. Those videos are quite entertaining.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I picture Jerry Miculek waxing multiple drones with a shotgun then casually turning toward the camera to talk about his split times.