this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
24 points (96.2% liked)

science

22803 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

preprint version because scihub doesn't have it yet https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10120732/

Abstract

Transformer models such as GPT generate human-like language and are predictive of human brain responses to language. Here, using functional-MRI-measured brain responses to 1,000 diverse sentences, we first show that a GPT-based encoding model can predict the magnitude of the brain response associated with each sentence. We then use the model to identify new sentences that are predicted to drive or suppress responses in the human language network. We show that these model-selected novel sentences indeed strongly drive and suppress the activity of human language areas in new individuals. A systematic analysis of the model-selected sentences reveals that surprisal and well-formedness of linguistic input are key determinants of response strength in the language network. These results establish the ability of neural network models to not only mimic human language but also non-invasively control neural activity in higher-level cortical areas, such as the language network.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flan@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'm trying to understand the abstract a little bit here but struggling. Is the implication here that they are able to push an LLM to create surprising or novel phrases by predicting the the strength of brain responses to those phrases?

If so that's an interesting approach to escape the problem of LLM-generated text being extraordinarily bland.

[–] YearOfTheCommieDesktop@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

honestly my first thought was basically AI generated speech jamming but your idea might be closer to reality

[–] flan@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah the way they worded it is really strange

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

sounds like their plan is working.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)