this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
559 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

74345 readers
2642 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 176 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (69 children)

I posted this in the other thread, but..

Now congress can tell any company to get fucked and sell to the highest bidder (edit: via bills crafted to target them specifically)? So much for free market republicans.

China will just find another company to buy our data from, because as it turns out, the problem isn't just TikTok, it's the fact the it's legal for companies (foreign and domestic) to sell and exchange our data in the first place. TikTok will still collect the same data, and instead of it going straight to China, it'll go to a rich white fuck first and they'll be the ones to sell it to China instead.

And if the problem is the fact that it's addictive, well, we have plenty of our own home grown addictions for people to sink their time into. You don't see congress telling those companies to get sold to a new owner.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem isn't actually just that China takes our data, it's that they control the algorithm on tiktok for what users see, thereby giving them the ability to manipulate the public.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah! And that's only a privilege for white oligarchs! /s

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would you rather a hostile foreign entity do it instead, who have vested interest in sewing destructive chaos as a goal, though? That's the alternative.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, there's a third alternative where manipulating us is illegal for anyone

[–] card797@champserver.net 1 points 1 year ago

That's just too vague to legislate. Stop talking to everyone because you're being manipulated non-stop by everyone you know.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, wish this was the actual goal but it's going to be hard to pry those rights out of their hands.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

if they were rights everyone would have them.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don’t need a “hostile foreign entity”. Trump is doing that just fine all on his own.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about Biden signing in the new spying bill recently that enhances wiretapping of US citizens?

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I completely missed this one. Gross.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Since we're not denying that white oligarchs do it too, then giving consumers a choice as to which manipulated information they see is better than having just our goverment decide. Sowing chaos isn't inherently bad - law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice, and when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress.

load more comments (66 replies)