this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
435 points (96.4% liked)

News

35749 readers
1954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Far more animals than previously thought likely have consciousness, top scientists say in a new declaration — including fish, lobsters and octopus.

Bees play by rolling wooden balls — apparently for fun. The cleaner wrasse fish appears to recognize its own visage in an underwater mirror. Octopuses seem to react to anesthetic drugs and will avoid settings where they likely experienced past pain. 

All three of these discoveries came in the last five years — indications that the more scientists test animals, the more they find that many species may have inner lives and be sentient. A surprising range of creatures have shown evidence of conscious thought or experience, including insects, fish and some crustaceans. 

That has prompted a group of top researchers on animal cognition to publish a new pronouncement that they hope will transform how scientists and society view — and care — for animals. 

Nearly 40 researchers signed “The New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness,” which was first presented at a conference at New York University on Friday morning. It marks a pivotal moment, as a flood of research on animal cognition collides with debates over how various species ought to be treated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Wasn’t this already obvious?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We don’t even know what sentience/sapience/whatever is. We have some thoughts, people argue about the definitions, and stuff; but really… it all comes down to… “are they like us”… but we don’t even really know what that means.

So no. It’s not obvious. (Particularly because humans are surprisingly stupid.)

[–] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

To people who spend a lot of time around animals or even sea creatures, it may be obvious that they’re more like us than most would assume.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 2 years ago

To put it another way, humans just aren't that special. We started from the assumption that we are somehow fundamentally different

We keep finding out that all sorts of animals have language and culture, and it blows my mind that apparently, just about everything seems to have something akin to a name

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, maybe, but it sure as he'll isn't convenient.

[–] ADonkeyBrainedFog@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

An Inconvenient Sentience

[–] anguo@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

Not to people indoctrinated by Abrahamic religions.

[–] speck@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

Denying such things in other animals has been part of a long-standing, mainly Western, push for human exceptionalism

[–] dani@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

My first, second, third and fourth thought. I didn’t have a fifth.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean people have been pushing for recognition of this for at least a few thousand years so I'd say yes.

The lengths people are willing to go in self delusion for a burger are astounding though.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Some people are just straight up fine eating beef because they don't care. Like, we won the food chain, and that's enough for them