this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
75 points (97.5% liked)

hexbear

10194 readers
1 users here now

Now that the old Hexbear fork has been officially abandoned, this community will be used as a space for meta-discussion on the site itself.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are a few users on the site without pronouns now (other than "none/use name", I mean like there is no pronoun field at all)

Was considering writing a no-fun-allowed patch for this unless this is intended behavior now? I would have submitted a diff but I can't build lemmy on my system to test any changes :(

It seems like the patch would be pretty easy, there is already pronoun validation code it just needs to be applied when people try to update their username

This seems like a deviation from the path laid out for us by comrade TC69

What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] footfaults@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The original proposal didn't have enough options. That's what caused most of the issues.

Sure there were some transphobes out there that lost their shit, but there were legitimate issues with the lack of choices when it was first proposed

[–] AutomatedPossum@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I had a very strong impression many of the complaints came from concern trolling cis people and they weren't very convincing in hiding their transphobia. They particularly did not complain about a lack of neopronouns, although some complained about opsec reasons - which can be easily adressed by picking none / use name or another neutral option, or just lying - if you value opsec over validation of your gender identity, why would you need a site culture where he / him is the implied default?

If people weren't happy with the lack of neopronouns (which was, ofc, a legitimate concern), why would they oppose pronoun tags on principle instead of demanding them, but with more inclusive options? The majority of the criticism back then was thinly veiled transphobia, please don't try to legitimize that.

[–] footfaults@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

by picking none / use name

That option was only introduced after quite a bit of argument. It was not an original option. I remember it not being an option.

[–] AutomatedPossum@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

ofc that should be an option, i'm friends with trans people irl that need this option because these people want to be adressed without third person pronouns, but to say that lack of options was the actual main concern in these struggle sessions is denying that we had a substantial number of transphobes from r/stupidpol in the community when we originally got kicked out of reddit, that they vocally opposed the trans inclusivity of this site, that we successfully purged them and that this was a good and important part of building the site culture.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)