this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)
Ukraine
10744 readers
186 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For as long as I've been politically aware, the US system was never touted as having an "efficient decision process". Care to clue me in on why you believe it does?
I don't believe it does, but I was tought in school in the 70's, that the reason USA was an imperfect 2 party democracy, was to create a "strong and efficient" government.
Don't the Britts have some of the same? First by the post is such a moronic thing, that may ensure one side a majority, at the cost of having more parties. I think in the case of both USA and Britain, it's proven pretty clearly it's not a good system. Yet it's maintained, because both the 2 dominant parties, enjoy power from efficiently excluding smaller parties can gain significance.