How many times do I have to explain to you that it's the UN stance that matters in terms of international law. The only reason I mentioned Postdam is as the basis for dialog. It's clear that you're just not reading what I'm writing. Bye.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But it's not a basis for dialog...

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

ok...

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks for finally admitting that this comment you made in reference to the Potsdam Declaration is simply wrong:

It (Potsdam Declaration) states that US has a one China policy and the government of China happens to be PRC as recognized by the UN and practically every nation on earth. If you still can't understand this basic fact what else is there to tell you.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

That comment says precisely what I've been telling you here. Postdam Declaration is the basis for the US one China policy, but UN recognition of PRC as the legitimate government is what matters internationally. It's absolutely hilarious that you've literally spent days perseverating over this. Get a life.