this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024

43 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers

1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

43

Heads up, Canadians: If your landlord is a non-resident and doesn't pay their taxes, you might have to pay their back taxes instead! Isn't that cool? (www.theglobeandmail.com)

submitted 1 year ago by HarryLime@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] drinkinglakewater@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

geordi-no Using eminent domain on deadbeat landlords to expand the inventory of public housing

geordi-yes Blasting tenants into homelessness

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah holy shit the whole argument is that the government can't force non-resident landowners to pay their taxes (fair enough). But rather than do the reasonable thing like seize assets until the tax debt is settled, they decide to charge the tenants to pay the taxes.