this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
2011 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

73567 readers
3916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (17 children)

While I'm sure there is a crazy markup, it's important to note the cost to produce - as in manufacture - does not include the cost of drug discovery, which is extremely expensive and involves a good amount of risk over a long period of time.

You can't just compare the cost of discovering a new drug vs. cost of producing a generic without any research like that.

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Fuck off with the big pharma apologetics.

Boo hoo the corporation got millions in taxpayer money to develop a vaccine and now they have to profit off of it. I feel so bad for them.

This is subtle astroturfing.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

By that same logic: it costs a couple of cents to burn a dvd or to transfer a few gigabytes, yet games costs $60.

All the commenter above you is saying is don't mix up the cost to develop with the cost to mass produce,

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Game DVDs are not lifesaving drugs.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm going to be unreasonable because I don't like the ethics behind Pharma companies.

They should eat the loss; their research was healthily subsidised by the taxpayer

load more comments (15 replies)