this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
84 points (98.8% liked)
Ukraine
10553 readers
580 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At a time when we should be spending the vast majority of time, money, and energy averting global climate disaster. :-(
instead we get countless fuel tanks, refinery, ammo dumps, vehicles and civil infrastructure fires! yay
It's already too late to avert the consequences of climate change. The amount of dedicated resources necessary would be orders of magnitude larger than what is being used in Ukraine.
So your saying we'd only need to stop 10 or 100 military activities, and take that amount of resource and we could solve this? Totally Win-Win! Wonderful!
If civilizez countries were to cut majority of their military spending, it wouldn't result in a win-win for all. Eg. Ukraine.